How to deliver a Building Information Model for LCA automation

How to make your BIM model work for Life-Cycle Assessment

On the one hand, BIM supports integrated design and improves information management and cooperation between the different stakeholders throughout the different project life-cycle phases. On the other hand, LCA is a suitable method for assessing environmental performance. Both LCA and BIM should be integrated in the decision-making process at an early stage with a view to achieving a holistic overview of the project, including environmental criteria, from the beginning.

Laura Álvarez, Antón Joaquín Díaz – “Integration of Life Cycle Assessment in a BIM Environment”, 2014

It is a known fact that integrating BIM and Building Life Cycle Assessment is an essential step towards achieving building sustainability on a larger scale. But very few BIM models are perfect, so to automate the calculations you should first work with your BIM model before importing it.

It is based on this premise, that we created and tested a prototype of a Model Checker for BIM with support from the Finnish ministry of environment’s KIRA-digi program. You can read the results of the study ici.

This guide helps you to design and deliver a BIM model suitable for automating Life-Cycle Assessment.

The main goal is to ensure that your BIM model contains sufficient information for LCA purposes. BIM models always contain a large amount of information about your building, however, for your LCA calculation you only need some of this information and defined following these practices.

Building roof labeled as ‘Soil’ – common and easily rectified misdefinition

Design principles for a BIM suitable for LCA automation – in a rough order of priority

1. Apply clear and consistent material labeling. Verify if the materials are labeled correctly and understandably (using specific technical references is also fine). So you can use e.g. Ready-mix concrete or Cast-in-place C30/37 or Steel stairs, but avoid [NO MATERIAL], Airspace, Foreground, White, etc. You can use your own language. Use specific material labels when possible (e.g. Metal – Steel S355, Concrete – Insitu Nwt – C20/25), and do avoid contradictory definitions, e.g. define object material as “Concrete” and object name as “Brick”.

2. Prefer layered elements for multi-material objects. When you add a multi-layer object, for example, an external wall, apply objects that contain the appropriate materials with relevant thicknesses, including eventual airspaces. If your objects are defined as solid objects and represent for example internal walls, apply labeling such as Internal wall, gypsum + steel studs to indicate it’s a build-up of several layers
3. When objects are meant to be hollow, model them as hollows or otherwise indicate that in labeling. If hollow objects are represented as solids, call your slabs hollow core slabs.

4. Export the model with reinforcement steel included. Structural models can be saved with reinforcements or omitting them for simplicity. If you have a model without reinforcement steel included in concretes, you will need to add back the right ratio of reinforcement by hand when using the model for LCA.

5. Check that the elements are properly classified in terms of IFC Class. This will avoid ambiguities and errors in the use and analysis of the model. The classification is likely also going to be used for filtering, so your scope might be off unless the classification is correct.

6. Do not worry about issues in parts of the model not needed for LCA. For example, LEED v4 LCA requires only structure and enclosure to be included, and many building certification systems such as BREEAM consider building site and installations as optional elements in LCA (though they may be required by a particular project to achieve higher rating). Verify the required scope from your client and focus on that.

Pre-stressed hollow core slabs accurately modeled with airspace included in the objects

Vous pourriez également aimer